Slides
> Slide 1
> Slide 2
> Slide 3
> Slide 4
> Slide 5
> Slide 6
> Slide 7
> Slide 8
> Slide 9
> Slide 10
> Slide 11
> Slide 12
> Slide 13
> Slide 14
> Slide 15
> Slide 16
> Slide 17
> Slide 18
> Slide 19
> Slide 20
> Slide 21
> Slide 22
> Slide 23
> Slide 24
> Slide 25
> Slide 26
> Slide 27
> Slide 28
> Slide 29
> Slide 30
> Slide 31
> Slide 32
> Slide 33
> Slide 34
> Slide 1
> Slide 2
> Slide 3
> Slide 4
> Slide 5
> Slide 6
> Slide 7
> Slide 8
> Slide 9
> Slide 10
> Slide 11
> Slide 12
> Slide 13
> Slide 14
> Slide 15
> Slide 16
> Slide 17
> Slide 18
> Slide 19
> Slide 20
> Slide 21
> Slide 22
> Slide 23
> Slide 24
> Slide 25
> Slide 26
> Slide 27
> Slide 28
> Slide 29
> Slide 30
> Slide 31
> Slide 32
> Slide 33
> Slide 34
Mechanical Anchor Strength in Stone Masonry
Click on slide for full size in new window
Starting with compressive strength, we looked at the sandstone Power Stud specimens tested in tension. All of these specimens failed by cube splitting. We don’t observe any pattern in this data. The failures are due to interlaminar weakness, rather than compressive strength.
Click on slide for full size in new window
Starting with compressive strength, we looked at the sandstone Power Stud specimens tested in tension. All of these specimens failed by cube splitting. We don’t observe any pattern in this data. The failures are due to interlaminar weakness, rather than compressive strength.