Slides
> Slide 1
> Slide 2
> Slide 3
> Slide 4
> Slide 5
> Slide 6
> Slide 7
> Slide 8
> Slide 9
> Slide 10
> Slide 11
> Slide 12
> Slide 13
> Slide 14
> Slide 15
> Slide 16
> Slide 17
> Slide 18
> Slide 19
> Slide 20
> Slide 21
> Slide 22
> Slide 23
> Slide 24
> Slide 1
> Slide 2
> Slide 3
> Slide 4
> Slide 5
> Slide 6
> Slide 7
> Slide 8
> Slide 9
> Slide 10
> Slide 11
> Slide 12
> Slide 13
> Slide 14
> Slide 15
> Slide 16
> Slide 17
> Slide 18
> Slide 19
> Slide 20
> Slide 21
> Slide 22
> Slide 23
> Slide 24
Documentation of Existing Facade Condtions in the Field
A Comparison of Two Methods
Like others who conduct building surveys and assessments, Vertical Access technicians use a notation system of fault codes developed to reflect conditions observed in the field. Although this system was developed as a standard notation, there is inevitably some variability in how conditions are recorded due to the fact that notes were still taken by hand and by different technicians. In this process, interpretative and transcriptive errors may result when drafting field notes into the final graphical product.
A Comparison of Two Methods
Like others who conduct building surveys and assessments, Vertical Access technicians use a notation system of fault codes developed to reflect conditions observed in the field. Although this system was developed as a standard notation, there is inevitably some variability in how conditions are recorded due to the fact that notes were still taken by hand and by different technicians. In this process, interpretative and transcriptive errors may result when drafting field notes into the final graphical product.